Wicked: Long Awaited Adaptation makes Magical Silver Screen Debut

Hi Readers,

Anyone who is into musical theatre will have heard of or even seen the musical of Wicked on the stage either on the West End where it currently plays at the Apollo Victoria Theatre or its runs on Broadway and regional theatres around the world.

It tells an untold story of the Wicked Witch of the West when she was just Elphaba and Galinda who becomes the Good Witch of the North. We see the two start as enemies and slowly become friends at Shiz University, long before Dorothy and Toto landed in Oz. The novel that the musical was based on was published by Gregory Maguire in 1995 and based on the original Wonderful Wizard of Oz books by L. Frank Baum and the 1939 film.

The film adaptation of Wicked has been in the works since 2012 and was finally released by Universal in November this year. Actors Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo have made headlines for their stunning performances, live vocals and sweet friendship. They have been a part of a few viral moments in the press such as Ariana holding onto Cynthia’s nail and a reporter asking them about ‘holding space for Defying Gravity’, the song at the end of the film.

The film has just received 4 Golden Globe nominations including for Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in their roles.

Wicked (2024)

As a musical fan myself, I was very excited to finally see Wicked brought to life on screen. I went to see the film twice with different people as I felt a need to watch it again and take in the spectacle. The production design, visual effects, costumes, props, acting and singing were all outstanding and really put other films to shame with the quality and imagination that went into the creation.

I particularly loved the inclusion of visual effects in the promo of the film with the Visual Effects Supervisor, Pablo Helman and other department members being included in interviews as well as blue screens being visible in promo released for the film. There was a lot of practical and special effects which are to be commended. As someone who has worked on visual effects it was great to see it mentioned when many other films try to hide their use of CGI or VFX.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo were perfectly cast for their roles and embodied Elphaba and Galinda with all their mannerisms and tone. Galinda had a great amount of snark and humour as well as being snooty and well-liked. Elphaba was quiet but stood up for the animals and her sister. She takes pride in her talents but feels Galinda and Fiyero are over the top. I love that Elphaba comes from the initials of the author: LFB ( El-ph-buh).

There were so many references to the Wizard of Oz film such as Galinda giving Elphaba her iconic black witch’s hat and cloak. Nessarose wears special silver shoes. The iconic ruby red slippers that Dorothy wears are silver in the original books and Galinda has some red slippers in her closet. When in the Emerald City with the Wizard, Galinda (now Glinda) suggests the Brick Road should be yellow as it is in the Wizard of Oz. We see Glinda visit the Munchkins at the beginning which is actually after the events of the Wizard of Oz film when the Witch has melted.

The songs were a highlight of the film and both Ariana and Cynthia sang live. All of the songs were really amazing with elaborate dance routines and montages and a host of background artists. My favourite songs include: What is This Feeling? where Galinda and Elphaba sing about their loathing for each other after being put in the same room at Shiz; The Wizard and I: Elphaba’s big solo number where she hopes that her life will turn around when meeting the Wizard and of course the finale number, Defying Gravity where Elphaba sings about becoming her true self and not letting anything hold her back anymore featuring Glinda trying to persuade her to stay and prove her innocence.

I am excited to hear the songs in Wicked: Part Two. I have seen the full play on the West End but I don’t remember the songs or much of the story. Hopefully, it will be as magical as the first film.

The ensemble cast all did a great job rounding out the film and I am glad to see people from musical theatre backgrounds get a chance such as Ethan Slater and having wheelchair users play Nessarose both as a child and as the older version was a win for disabled actors. Nessarose becomes the Wicked Witch of the East so I am interested to see how she turns ‘wicked’ as her character is sweet and caring in the first film.

Jonathan Bailey as Fiyero is a character I look forward to seeing more of in the sequel. He has strong charisma and in the film manages to have chemistry with basically every character regardless of gender which was great to see even in a PG as being not just heterosexual shouldn’t be something relegated to more adult themed films.

Overall, I loved the film of Wicked and seeing it on the big screen was a great way to watch it. Next year, hopefully they will be showing double bills with the sequel as it would be great to watch them back to back especially as they were shot in succession. Until then, I will be listening to the soundtrack.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

New Perspectives: Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice – Can a sequel almost 40 years later really improve a cult classic?

Hi Readers,

It has been a while since my New Perspectives series. When I started posting again on my blog over a year ago, my first post was a review of the Little Mermaid after attending a cast and crew screening. Now the first film project I worked on is in the cinemas and I attended a cast and crew screening again for Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.

Despite working on the film almost 18 months ago, it was amazing to see some of the scenes in their complete form and what had changed in the final cut. I only did three short scenes so I felt that I didn’t really have much inside knowledge of the film as a whole or even any special plot details. When working on the film, I didn’t really know much about Beetlejuice and the following it has gained since its release in 1988.

I saw the original film a few days before the sequel and I was pleasantly surprised. In my head, I had built it up to be a gruesome tale with lots of goo and bugs combined with 80s practical effects and outdated plots. However, I discovered this was not the case and I can see why many people cite it as a childhood or adulthood favourite.

I had no idea that Alec Baldwin and Geena Davies were basically the leads of the film or that they played ghosts, I barely knew who or what Beetlejuice was. The effects used were a little dated especially the visual effects in the afterlife scenes but all the practical stuff held up well and was not too gooey or gory. Beetlejuice himself was a bit of a garish character but didn’t appear for the 1st third and was much more palatable. The only slight dated things were the fact that he wanted to marry Lydia played by a 15-year-old Winona Ryder but as she strongly objected and it ended up not happening, I don’t think this was too strong an issue.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)

The sequel to Beetlejuice has been very hyped up with the cast going on a press tour and the film opening the Venice Film Festival. I think part of the reason is that Tim Burton rarely revisits his projects and so many of the original cast were really keen to make the film happen. I read that it has been an idea since 1990 so I am sure that they are all pleased it has finally happened. Winona Ryder had a Beetlejuice clause in her Stranger Things contract that if the sequel ever happened that she would be allowed to go and film it. Luckily, it was filmed when Stranger Things was on a break.

Jenna Ortega is the new star of the film having previously collaborated with Tim Burton on Wednesday, Series 2 is now in production. She has gained a reputation in the industry for loving all things horror just like Winona Ryder back in the 1980s and 90s. Her outfits on the press tour have even echoed some of Ryder’s from films or real life together with nods to Beetlejuice.

One of my qualms with the first Beetlejuice was that it took place mostly in the house, now referred to as the Ghost House because the ghosts couldn’t leave otherwise, they would end up in the afterlife. With the main characters – Lydia, Astrid and Delia, all still alive we get to see more of the world of Winter River and their lives further afield.

The film starts with showing an overview of the town as in the first film. We get to see a grown-up Lydia (Ryder) in her TV studio making her show about ghosts. It seems she has used her ability from the first film to make a career for herself. She is also dating her producer, Rory (Justin Theroux) who exhibits some controlling tendencies. Her daughter, Astrid (Ortega) is at a boarding school outside New York and having trouble fitting in. Delia Deetz (Catherine O’Hara) is a famous artist with an exhibition in the city including some of her interesting sculptures from the first film. We see one outside Astrid’s school along with the Deetz Center for Art.

The three are pulled together after the death of Charles, their husband/father/grandfather. They gather at the Ghost House in Winter River for the funeral, during which Rory proposes to Lydia, setting the date for 2 days time – Halloween, her favourite holiday but also traditionally spooky.

Astrid meets Jeremy, a lonely teen in his tree house who shows her a way to access the afterlife and see her father, who died on a trip to the Amazon. Lydia meanwhile is doing everything in her powers to keep Betelgeuse (Beetlejuice – Michael Keaton) at bay, knowing the trouble he caused for her and the family before. A well-meaning Rory summons him for some closure but this only intensifies Betelgeuse’s obsession with Lydia, of whom he has a framed photo.

His life in the underworld has expanded with a whole office of shrunken-headed Bobs working on typewriters for him. Unfortunately, a cleaner (Danny Devito) manages to disturb some storage and his undead ex-wife, Delores (Monica Bellucci) reforms and begins her search for him. She is not pleased to see his desires for Lydia.

Delia tries to commune with her dead husband after seeing how his death has affected her ability to produce her art. We also see Charles’ journey in the underworld trying to find Delia. A former actor playing cop (Willem Dafoe) is also on the hunt for Betelgeuse, believing him to be linked to Delores’ trail of murders.

Many elements of the first film have been expanded upon including the afterlife with a similar look but with more elaborate sets and new dead people, all having transformed into unique creatures after their deaths. We also see the desert place complete with sandworms. Alec Baldwin and Geena Davies were not in this film and I think that was a good decision as it would have tied it to the house too much. Geena Davies explained the absence recently by saying that ghosts stay the same age so they wouldn’t look the part anymore. Apparently, Tim Burton was keen for Baldwin to make a comeback but ultimately, I think the focus on the women of the family was a good plot point.

I enjoyed the dynamic between Lydia, Astrid and Delia. They didn’t try to make them band together in the face of adversity but I think by the end of the film some of their rifts had been healed after their brush with the underworld again.

Working on the project, I knew some scenes and plot points but there was still a lot I didn’t know and I felt I could still enjoy the film and be surprised by parts. The cast and crew have talked about the practical sets but VFX was used to enhance these and I think made the film better. The invisible effects used sometimes get overlooked by audiences as they tend to focus on CGI characters but even lightening a scene, adding extras or touching up the actor’s appearance is visual effects.

Overall, I really enjoyed Beetlejuice Beetlejuice and I think it was even better than the first film using modern technology and an expanded cast to explore more of the universe and gave us a female powered story.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

My Letterboxd Four Favourites

Hello Readers,

I am sure many fellow film fanatics will be well aware of the platform Letterboxd but as a recent convert, I want to share what my four favourites are as users list in their profile.

I see many celebrities listing highbrow films by directors such as Fellini, Hitchcock and even more obscure but as someone who enjoys films more from the 21st century, my favourites are not as revered. I have no issues with people appreciating older cinema but even after studying film, I have never quite connected with the classics. I chose films that I would happily watch over and over without getting bored and ones with strong themes or just something that makes me laugh.

Here is a link to my Letterboxd profile if you would like to check out what I have been watching the past couple of months: https://letterboxd.com/robynhirstallen/

The Day After Tomorrow (2004)

Even before Letterboxd, this film has been in my top 3 since I saw it about 15 years ago. One of my favourite sub genres of films are natural disasters and this definitely fits into that category. While far-fetched and exaggerated, it does show the dangers of climate change and what may happen if we don’t take it seriously.

What I think draws me into films like this as well as films that are post-apocalyptic or alternate futures, is that the people left in the world have to work together to survive and you get to see humanity more united that it is or has been for a long time. It also creates a certain jeopardy that is not caused by one person or a group of people but rather by something that cannot be controlled and is unavoidable.

The Day After Tomorrow has three main plot lines: the first is about Sam and his friends who have flown to New York City for a debate competition. Jake Gyllenhaal (Sam) and Emmy Rossum (Laura) and Arjay Smith (Brian) star as the trio of high schoolers. After the floods, they are helped by another debater, J.D. (Austin Nichols) and shelter in the New York Public Library.

The second group are Sam’s father, Jack, played by Dennis Quaid along with his friends Jason and Frank. They were recently in Antarctica studying cold fronts and set off from Washington DC to rescue Sam and his friends while the weather turns into a new Ice Age.

The third group work in a laboratory in Scotland studying the weather and quickly come to realise that they aren’t going to be going anywhere any time soon. We get snippets from events around the world such as tornadoes in Los Angeles, snow in India, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis and many other unbelievable weather events.

While the visual effects may not be as impressive and what we are used to seeing 20 years later, I think that they do hold up and the scenes when the floods invade Manhattan are quite realistic. The director, Roland Emmerich is known for films of this genre and scale such as 2012 and Independence Day so I think he got the tone right by including round the world events but also focusing on the relationships between the main characters.

Sam only joined the debate team to impress his crush, Laura while Brian and Laura are very academic. When J.D. joins their group, there is a bit of friction as Laura takes a shine to him but when she gets sick, everyone puts her health first. Jack and his colleagues have been trying to prove that climate change is real and that another Ice Age could happen but unfortunately the government don’t listen to him. His wife is a healthcare professional and we see her looking after sick children and waiting with them to be evacuated from Washington DC to the Southern States.

Overall, the film has jeopardy, adventure, action and drama along with characters you can relate to. One of the most heartbreaking scenes is when everyone sheltering in the library leaves and then you see them frozen to death outside after a cold front swept through.

Available on Disney+

Mamma Mia! (2008)

A smash hit musical and the subsequent films revived the music of ABBA in recent years. Since their success at Eurovision in 1974, the band’s popularity dwindled after their break up but Catherine Johnson put them back on everyone’s playlists.

I am a big fan of musicals, especially musical films as when watching at the cinema or at home you can always hear every lyric and see every dance routine without someone trying to record it in front of you. Mamma Mia! is the first musical film I remember watching around age 10 and even though the themes and the story were more for adults, I enjoyed the music, comedy and dance routines.

This film has been a family favourite since that first watch and has always been there when you need cheering up or are simply in the mood for sun and singing. The A list cast certainly adds to the fun with Meryl Streep making a star turn as Donna Sheridan along with Julie Walters and Christine Baranski, the trio make excellent Dynamos with their differences bringing them together. The three male leads, all Donna’s past lovers, Colin Firth, Pierce Brosnan and Stellan Skarsgård bring the comedy and while there have been notes about their lack of singing ability, I think that all adds to the fun and lightheartedness of the film.

The main plot centres around Donna’s daughter Sophie, played by Amanda Seyfried wanting to invite her father to her wedding to fiance Sky (Dominic Cooper). She sends out invitations to her three suspects as discovered in her mother’s old diaries. When Donna finds the three having turned up at her hotel on a remote Greek island, she panics and hilarity ensues. It’s clear that Sam (Brosnan) was the true love of her life but circumstances kept him away.

In the original musical, Bill is Australian but he was changed to Swedish to honour the band ABBA and the actor playing him in the film. There were a few other changes with some songs being cut for time but with the same person writing the screenplay for the film, it was a faithful adaption.

My personal favourite songs are Dancing Queen where all the women of the town follow Donna and her sidekicks through the town in a big group number; Mamma Mia, Donna’s solo number and the grande finale Take a Chance on Me where Rosie (Walters) makes her play for Bill that ends in everyone dancing and water bursting through the floor tiles.

For me this film never gets old and is so joyful, I had to include it in my Four Favourites. It has always been hanging around my top 5 films and I included it in a post a while ago about my Desert Island Films. There was a sequel in 2018 which I enjoyed but nothing beats the first film.

If you enjoy musicals and/or the music of ABBA, you will definitely enjoy this film. I have introduced many people to it and no one has ever come away with negative thoughts even if they are not the biggest musical fan. There are elements to enjoy such as the comedy, the summer island paradise and heartwarming story.

Available on Amazon Prime

Little Miss Sunshine (2006)

This film has a lot of themes going on that would make it a great study in a film lecture or something similar and is quite dark but when I watched this for the first time at a similar age to Olive (Abigail Breslin), these were not the things that stayed with me. I wouldn’t say this film has made it to my top 5 until I joined Letterboxd but after a re-watch last year and truly appreciating the film with adult eyes, I couldn’t help but include it.

The film centres around the Hoover family and their various problems. Teenager Dwayne (Paul Dano) has committed to a vow of silence until he achieves his dream of becoming a fighter pilot. Olive’s father, Richard (Greg Kinnear) is trying to switch careers into becoming a life coach and influential speaker and is currently negotiating a contract to jump start his career. His father, Edwin (Alan Arkin) has a drug problem and has come to live with the family. He also starts coaching Olive in beauty pageanting after she entered and won a local contest.

A family road trip ensues for Olive to participate in the Little Miss Sunshine Pageant in Redondo Beach, California. The family go in their iconic yellow Volkswagen camper van that has many problems along the way. Also on the trip are Sheryl (Toni Collette) who is reluctant to let her daughter, Olive compete and Sheryl’s brother, Frank (Steve Carell) who is staying with the family after losing his professor position and attempting suicide due to a affair with a male student ending badly.

While many of the Hoover family’s problems seem quite dark, it is a light-hearted film with emotional moments. For example, the scene where they accidentally leave Olive at the gas station and the van cannot stop so she has to run alongside it and hop in is a memorable one.

The cast and the script really make this film into something outstanding and one that is talked about still almost 15 years later. The family deal with things together and even events or problems that could make them give up, help to bond them closer together.

The final scenes where Olive is performing in the pageant are very funny and the juxtaposition of all the other competitors being over-sexualised compared with the shock at Olive’s inappropriate dance shows how society picks and chooses what to be offended by.

It is hard to find another film that evokes that same emotions but one with more positive situations is The Way Way Back from 2013 which also stars Toni Collette and Steve Carell.

Overall I think this film is a light hearted drama with comedic moments featuring an elite cast and a great script. Would recommend to slightly older viewers to truly understand the themes.

Available on Disney+

This is Where I Leave You (2014)

Another comedy drama but this one has more laugh out loud moments. Another great cast with Jane Fonda as the matriarch of the Altman family. She brings her four grown up children back to their childhood home to sit shiva after their father’s death even though he was an atheist. Shiva is a Jewish tradition of a seven day mourning period where the first degree relatives welcome other mourners and share in their grief.

This situation forces the family back together each bringing their own problems. Our protagonist Judd (Jason Bateman) starts the film by finding his wife, Quinn (Abigail Spencer) in bed with her secret lover (Dax Shepard). He decides to divorce her but does not tell the family. Wendy (Tina Fey) has two young kids with her husband who is not very interested in being present with his family and finds any excuse to call work. She also experiences what could have been by reconnecting with Horry, a neighbour whom she dated in high school until he suffered a brain injury.

Paul (Corey Stoll) and his wife, Annie (Kathryn Hahn) are struggling to conceive and it is also revealed that Annie used to be Judd’s girlfriend when they were younger. Last is the baby of the family, Phillip (Adam Driver) who turns up to the house with his girlfriend who was his therapist and is quite a bit older than him.

Trapped together, the family start to unravel with many secrets coming forward. Judd finds out that his ex-wife Quinn is pregnant with no idea if he is the father. Annie tries seducing Judd after wondering if her husband is the issue with their fertility issues and Phillip’s girlfriend leaves him after he flirts with younger women.

What drew me to this film is the feeling of connection and family. While there are many hilarious moments, there are also lovely moments such as Wendy being comforted by her mother and Judd finding love again with Penny (Rose Byrne). One of the funniest moments is when the brothers sneak out of temple to smoke a joint that was found in their late father’s jacket.

The actors in the film are all known for comedy, an early role for Adam Driver who really keeps up with the other actors and I think again the script really helps. Other actors featured are Timothy Olyphant, Connie Britton and Ben Schwartz.

I have re-watched this film a few times but not for a while but I think the Four Favourites is about films you could come across playing on TV and happily sit there and watch. They are not necessarily films I revisit every year but I would always recommend them to people and they evoke feelings of comfort or humour when re-watching.

Not available for free but available to buy/rent on most streaming platforms

So these are my current Four Favourites on Letterboxd and while I am happy with my choices, they are not set in stone so if I do swap any then an updated version of this post could be on the cards.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

Awards Season Recap: Who actually won the Statues?

Hello Readers,

With Awards Season drawing to a close, I am looking back on this year’s most popular films in nominations to see what awards they actually walked away with from the big ceremonies. There were a few surprises this year including Emma Stone winning Best Actress for her role in Poor Things at the Academy Awards and I’m Just Ken from Barbie winning over Billie’s song at the Critics Choice Awards.

Unfortunately, many of the winners this season are from films featuring straight white characters in English. I have chosen the main American/British ceremonies as my markers but the films with POC/queer characters or not in English did not do as well in these categories. Napoleon is the exception, I believe it was widely panned due to its historical inaccuracies and confusing story line.

Oppenheimer (2023)

Oscars: 13 nominations and 7 wins

BAFTAs: 13 nominations and 7 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 13 nominations and 8 wins

Golden Globes: 8 nominations and 5 wins

SAG Awards: 4 nominations and 3 wins

Oppenheimer did about as well as expected winning over half its nominations at all the ceremonies. It is an America-centric film with the cast, crew and funding coming from the US featuring an important American event and invention. Christoper Nolan is a well-respected director in the film industry and along with his production team, has been responsible for some of the most visually interesting and complex films of recent years including Inception (2010), Interstellar (2014) and Tenet (2020). Robert Downey Jr won all of his nominations for the film along with the editing, score and director nominees sweeping their categories. Personally, I think there were other films that deserved some of these awards but I am pleased for the team particularly Emma Thomas winning the Oscar alongside Nolan for Best Picture.

Barbie (2023)

Oscars: 8 nominations and 1 win

BAFTAs: 5 nominations and 0 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 18 nominations and 6 wins

Golden Globes: 9 nominations and 2 wins

SAG Awards: 4 nominations and 0 wins

Unfortunately Barbie was largely panned at most of the awards. It managed to secure decent nominations and a whopping 18 at the Critics Choice Awards but did not deliver in terms of wins. I believe where Critics were concerned, it was a hit but with such a strong year, other films appealed to a wider range of voters. I believe this to be the case at the Oscars and Globes. Barbie was a well-produced film with so many details but with being marketed towards women and starring a toy doll that was mostly successful in the US, I don’t think this film quite had the reach. Ironically, Oppenheimer with an American plot, largely white cast and upsetting plot details did rather well. Take that as you will about the state of the country.

The Holdovers (2023)

Oscars: 5 nominations and 1 win

BAFTAs: 7 nominations and 2 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 8 nominations and 3 wins

Golden Globes: 3 nominations and 2 wins

SAG Awards: 2 nominations and 1 win

This film did well in chosen areas such as acting but was largely ignored in others. The core cast really brought the humour and raw emotion of the film to life. This film was also set in an elite part of American society on the East Coast with mainly white characters but perhaps the boarding school element was just not as much of a hit among the voters. The inclusion of Mary as a main character despite her lower status as the school cook was a well-meaning attempt to connect with other elements of society but I am not sure it 100% worked. I did enjoy the film and the story but I think it appealed more to my demographic. In another weaker year, I think this film could have taken home more. It certainly would have done well in a less diverse voting pool.

American Fiction (2023)

Oscars: 5 nominations and 1 win

BAFTAs: 1 nomination and 1 win

Critics Choice Awards: 5 nominations and 1 win

Golden Globes: 2 nominations and 0 wins

SAG Awards: 3 nominations and 0 wins

Many people have declared this film an important piece of cinema due to the themes of the plot. Perhaps white and non-black voters just could not relate to the concepts that this film was trying to portray. It was certainly punchier in its themes of blackness and racial divide than the Holdovers but brought humour to it. The film was very interesting and although the book/film featured was over the top it was trying to demonstrate how people want to hear black voices. It was maybe this metaphor that people did not pick up on and took the film at face value. To me, this film was one of the biggest snubs on the list due to its important ideas and complex characters. I am glad its wins were for the script as that is what made the film shine.

Poor Things (2023)

Oscars: 11 nominations and 4 wins

BAFTAs: 11 nominations and 5 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 13 nominations and 1 win

Golden Globes: 7 nominations and 2 wins

SAG Awards: 2 nominations and 0 wins

I still have yet to watch Poor Things despite it being available on streaming and its award record can possibly show why. It made a big splash in nominations but has lacked in terms of wins. Most awards have been for Emma Stone’s portrayal of Bella Baxter and the design teams (costumes, production, hair and makeup and VFX). The plot or film overall has not had much success. Without having seen it myself, I cannot judge too much but the strong and graphic sex scenes may have something to do with it. I believe Americans to still be prudish when it comes to sex on screen, never rewarding films with an R rating highly at awards shows. Brits maybe equally as so with the BAFTAs all being for the design teams. It had good reviews when it came out but only winning one award at the Critics Choice Awards demonstrates its reception among the experts.

Past Lives (2023)

Oscars: 2 nominations and 0 wins

BAFTAs: 3 nominations and 0 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 3 nominations and 0 wins

Golden Globes: 5 nominations and 0 wins

SAG Awards: 0 nominations/wins

This film did not manage to pick up an award in the award shows I have chosen to highlight but was successful at others. This film was very much about relationships and characters rather than visually stunning VFX or exciting action sequences. It was also told in a mix of Korean and English which may have put some people off. I personally liked the film but I wouldn’t be voting it over others in its categories. Again, being such a strong year especially for foreign language cinema was a downfall of this film. It was great to see female stories be told with Celine Song directing and Greta Lee starring.

Anatomy of a Fall (2023)

Oscars: 5 nominations and 1 win

BAFTAs: 7 nominations and 1 win

Critics Choice Awards: 3 nominations and 1 win

Golden Globes: 4 nominations and 2 wins

SAG Awards: 0 nominations/wins

I have recently watched this film and I did enjoy it. The plot was pacy with the court room scenes framing the relationship between Sandra and her husband. Being mostly in French and again with no big action scenes/VFX, the film was largely panned. It was awarded for its screenplay though and being written by a husband and wife duo was probably the reason. Sandra Hüller in the lead was a very strong choice but she did not show emotions in the traditional ways which was one of the arguments she had with her husband before his death. The film was left open ended in terms of whether he died by suicide or other means but it was right to show that this was not important at the end of the day.

The Zone of Interest (2023)

Oscars: 5 nominations and 2 wins

BAFTAs: 9 nominations and 3 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 1 nomination and 0 wins

Golden Globes: 3 nominations and 0 wins

SAG Awards: 0 nominations/wins

This film was also largely ignored at this years awards picking up awards for its sound and best foreign language film. The fact that it was filmed in Poland in German with the Nazis at the centre probably had a lot to do with it. There are a lot of Jewish Americans in Hollywood but whether the film was a painful reminder or simply didn’t appeal to other voters, I am not sure. With the Israel/Palestine conflict going on at the moment, a film showing the oppression of Jewish people maybe didn’t hit the mark. It has to be said that the director and producers of the film are Jewish and gave a very strong speech about war at the Oscars. I have not yet seen the film and I would not say that I am particularly excited to, given its content.

Napoleon (2023)

Oscars: 3 nominations and 0 wins

BAFTAs: 4 nominations and 0 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 1 nomination and 0 wins

Golden Globes: 0 nominations/wins

SAG Awards: 0 nominations/wins

As mentioned above, this was the most surprising pan of the awards given its director and historical story. Ridley Scott is not usually an awards director but many of his films have been critically acclaimed and hailed by audiences as great cinema. Napoleon did not manage to do this. It angered the French with its British/American cast and great historical inaccuracies. I also found the plot confusing, jumping around different dates like it had somewhere to be. The relationship between Napoleon and Josephine was meant to be a strong point but they spent most of the film hating each other and all the sex scenes were rough and abusive. I think Vanessa Kirby did what she could with the script but I did not feel any warmth from Napoleon towards her even when he hadn’t left her for a younger, fertile woman. The scant nominations were for the costumes, production and VFX all of which looked great but unfortunately the plot/acting could not support it.

Maestro (2023)

Oscars: 7 nominations and 0 wins

BAFTAs: 7 nominations and 0 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 8 nominations and 0 wins

Golden Globes: 4 nominations and 0 wins

SAG Awards: 2 nominations and 0 wins

In nominations, Maestro did respectably well but did not manage to pick up an award. It was a very strong year but I think that Leonard Bernstein being bisexual/into men and women was not well received with voters and particularly cheating on his wife in their later years. There was a controversy about the prosthetic used to give Bradley Cooper a more Jewish looking nose but it was approved by the family. Personally I think Bradley looked more like Leonard with his own nose. The film was a good watch, I saw it at the London Film Festival last year and while an enjoyable film, I have not reached to watch it again on streaming. Carey Mulligan was strong as always but she got drowned out by other stronger performances in her categories from Da’Vine Joy Randolph and America Ferrera. An enjoyable film but it couldn’t hold its own this year.

Killers of the Flower Moon (2023)

Oscars: 10 nominations and 0 wins

BAFTAs: 9 nominations and 0 wins

Critics Choice Awards: 12 nominations and 0 wins

Golden Globes: 7 nominations and 1 win

SAG Awards: 3 nominations and 1 win

I am almost surprised at the panning that this film received given its powerhouse combo of Martin Scorsese, Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro. In the past this trio would have swept prizes but with the topic of the murder of Native Americans, they couldn’t make the leap. The only awards came for Lily Gladstone as Best Actress. While she was good, I am not sure her performance in the film was actually enough to secure the win. There may have been white guilt at play for the treatment of Native Americans or just an inability to relate to the culture. The film itself could have been done better in my eyes with too many characters to keep track of and most of the focus being on the few white male characters. If this film had been directed by a female Native American with Scorsese producing, I think there could have been a different result. It would have also made more sense as a limited series.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

Film Review: Mean Girls – a musical reboot of a cultural classic holds up

Hi Readers,

Last week I saw the reboot/revival of the cultural icon and successful musical now coming to the West End: Mean Girls. Many people online did not seem aware that the film was a musical in spite of the existence of the musical, the casting of Reneé Rapp (who starred as Regina George in the Broadway version) and the trailer.

The 2004 film starring the best of 2000s Hollywood – Lindsay Lohan, Rachel McAdams, Amanda Seyfried, Tina Fey, Lizzy Caplan, Amy Poehler and Lacey Chabert (more of a 90s icon) – has generated endless chatter, memes, Halloween outfits, recreations and TikToks. This new version has updated some of the politically incorrect or offensive language – i.e Regina is now a fugly cow and Cady is not approached about muffins in the cafeteria.

The Broadway version adapted by Tina Fey only had a short life on stage due to the Covid 19 pandemic so its great to see it immortalised on the screen with its original star Reneé Rapp. Since her turn as Regina, Reneé has gone on to star in the popular HBO series, The Sex Lives of College Girls and released music – Tummy Hurts, Snow Angels and become a bi icon.

Mean Girls (2024)

The film starts with an upbeat opening number by Janis (Auli’i Cravalho) and Damien (Jacquel Spivey) the ones who guide Cady through North Shore High School and its teenage population. It only seems right that they guide the audience through the film. Some updates to their characters include changing their ethnicity and giving them more up to date interests. For example, Janis wears more popular but still hippy clothes, loves blue eye-shadow and her art involves string and sewing.

Cady (Angourie Rice) moves from Kenya with her mother (Jenna Fischer) to the Chicago area in the US and goes from a quiet home-schooled life to figuring out the cliques and social norms of the American high school. The character of Cady’s father has been erased along with the story of her first crush at four years old. What has stayed is Cady’s iconic blue checked shirt that she wears on the first day.

When Cady meets the Plastics they look more high school age than in the original and have a more up to date style. Regina (Reneé Rapp) is wearing a full black leather number with Gretchen (Bebé Woods) and Karen (Avantika) wearing preppy/colourful outfits.

After Cady learns her new calculus class crush, Aaron Samuels (Christoper Briney) is Regina’s ex-boyfriend and therefore strictly off-limits, she agrees to help Janis and Damien bring Regina down a peg or two.

Karen’s solo song ‘Sexy’ tells the audience the boundaries of Halloween costumes and that as long as your outfit is sexy than anything goes. Cady unfortunately does not get this memo and turns up as a Vampire Bride. Seeing Aaron with Cady alerts Regina to the potential threat that Cady poses she and quickly marks her territory by kissing Aaron.

Much like in the original film, Janis, Damien and Cady devise a plan to take away everything from Regina: her perfect skin, hot body, loyal sidekicks and reignited relationship with Aaron.

While Cady only hangs out with Janis and Damien in secret she is gradually turning more Plastic including writing about her teacher, Mrs Norbury (Tina Fey) in the Burn Book and pretending to be dumb so Aaron will tutor her.

Much of the film follows the original including the entire junior class gathering in the gym for a female bonding experience, Cady’s enrolment in the Mathletes and the famous Spring Fling scene with the tiara.

I think that this revival of the film based on the musical is a fresh take on the iconic tale keeping in many of the iconic lines – ‘That’s so fetch’; ‘It’s October 3rd’; ‘the limit does not exist’; ‘You can’t sit with us’ and ‘On Wednesdays we wear pink’. There were some important updates to incorporate the changes in culture and what is acceptable to say especially among teenagers.

I think that the original songs gave a great insight into the character’s thoughts especially Regina and Janis. Making Janis and Damien the narrator characters who introduce the show was clever as they are the ones that introduce Cady and the audience to the cliques in the canteen and the Plastics.

My favourite song from the soundtrack is Apex Predator as it has a good beat and really shows the power and influence that Regina has over the student population.

I’m glad that the musical made it to the big screens as it was cut short on Broadway due to pandemic and it is now coming to the West End.

The cast was well chosen and they all brought new aspects to the roles. I like that Reneé Rapp was not the skinniest girl so showing that all body types can be considered desirable. Rather than focusing on their appearances, it appeared that the Plastics popularity comes from power and knowing things about everyone as demonstrated with the Burn Book.

Overall, I thought the film was fun and for everyone that grew up with the original 2004 version, it was a blast to the past. Definitely worth a watch if you enjoy musicals or the original. I give it 5/5.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

Film Review: The Marvels

Hello readers,

With cinema releases ramping up again for the end of the year, I thought I would turn my attention to my most recent watch: The Marvels. The sequel to the first film featuring Captain Marvel played by the brilliant Brie Larson, now includes her new companions Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris) and Ms Marvel (Iman Vellani).

It is wonderful to see Marvel evolving more towards female led films with the recent additions of Black Widow, Black Panther 2 and Captain Marvel. The expansion into television series on Disney Plus has also allowed for more female leads with Scarlet Witch in WandaVision; Jen Walters in She-Hulk and the upcoming Agatha: Darkhold Diaries and Echo both featuring female protagonists.

The Marvel Cinematic Universe started out led by male characters: Iron Man, Captain America, Thor and so on with women only serving as sidekicks or love interests, for example Pepper Potts, Peggy Carter and Jane Foster. Over the years, we have seen these characters all get their own storylines, hero moments and even television programmes. The inclusion of female superheroes, in my eyes, has expanded the audience that the Marvel films and shows attract. A younger girl can look at Black Widow or Captain Marvel or any of the other badass women and see someone representing them.

When people see themselves represented on screen by a powerful independent character that is the hero, it can help them to imagine themselves as a hero or even just someone who can make it through tough times. Representation has been expanding in terms of gender, race and sexuality but there are still huge leaps to be made in terms of equality. For Marvel, the source material of the comic books may have held them up at first as the stories of the 1950s and 60s featured mainly male heroes but with new storylines and characters written all the time, there is progress being made towards equity in the MCU.

The Marvels (2023)

Captain Marvel is one of the MCUs more mysterious characters. We know where she came from and how she got her powers but between the events of the first and second film there is a huge chunk of her life missing.

Carol Danvers may have been away from Earth for a while with a brief appearance in the Battle against Thanos but she has not been resting. Her aim is to solve the political unrest between the Kree and the Skrulls that she believes is due to her actions.

While Carol has been gone, new heroes have come to be. There is Monica Rambeau who we see in WandaVision (2021) gain her powers from interacting with the powers of the Scarlet Witch. Monica did appear in the first Captain Marvel film but as a child or ‘Lieutenant Trouble’ as Carol called her. Her mother, Maria was Carol’s best friend and unfortunately passed away during the Blip. Monica is now working with Nick Fury’s new venture, S.A.B.E.R in Earth’s atmosphere, only using her powers sparingly.

Ms Marvel, real name Kamala Khan is a Captain Marvel super fan and has posters all over her wall and is introduced in the Ms Marvel (2022) series. Upon donning her Nani’s bangle, she gains the ability to manipulate light and make it into solid matter. After being hunted by the Department of Damage Control (part of the former S.H.I.E.L.D), stopping the Clandestines and learning she is a mutant, Kamala suddenly swaps places with Captain Marvel.

The film kicks off where Ms Marvel ends with Carol appearing in Kamala’s room. The three way swapping continues as Carol was in the middle of fighting some Kree soldiers and they are accidentally transported to the Khans’ living room.

I thought the switching between the three heroes made the fight scene interesting and quickly reintroduced the characters to us along with alerting Fury and the Khans’ about the interlinking powers.

To minimise damage, Kamala and Monica join Captain Marvel on her ship and set out to stop Dar-Benn from decimating worlds to reawaken the Kree’s home planet, Hala. Kamala is obviously delighted with the plan much to the dismay of her mother while Monica is less keen given the history between her and Carol. She believes that Carol abandoned her on purpose with her dying mother and after the Blip, she then had no family left.

Carol also has to quickly learn the dynamic with an adult Monica with powers and teenage fan in tow. Having three female leads paved the way for more comedy and joviality than is typically seen in male led Marvel films. Kamala especially has not experienced the wider reaches of the universe and comes into new situations with a positive attitude and open heart. Carol acts as their guide and even stiff and stoic Monica begins to enjoy the quest.

I won’t go into what other things occur but let’s just say that if you’re looking for Easter eggs or clues for future projects, this is not a film to miss.

Another returning character is Goose. A sweet ginger cat who acts as Carol’s sidekick who just happens to be able to launch 30 foot tentacles from its mouth. Goose has been a fan favourite since his appearance in the first Captain Marvel film and the revelation that he was the one that gave Fury his eye patch. Goose’s new Flerken ability is revealed in the new film when he regurgitates items from the Khan’s living room. If you are a cat fan, then this film will feature a few more furry friends.

Overall, I really enjoyed Marvel’s latest outing. The grumpy/sunshine dynamic with Kamala and Monica played well against Carol who can be a mix of both. We got to see some favourite characters and meet some new ones. One funny scene sees Yusuf Khan give someone pension advice only to learn their real age.

There was a good balance of action, comedy, family interactions and heart especially with the reflections on Maria’s passing. It was great to see Kamala live her dreams of meeting her hero and learn that she is a fully fledged person and not just Captain Marvel.

I give this film 4.5 out of 5.

Happy Watching,

Robyn

2023: Summer of Cinema: Barbie

The film uses all of these controversies in their plot and makes sure that we know that they do not condone Barbie’s unrealistic body but rather celebrate her achievements. We start with the 2001: Space Odyssey opener that has been teased, letting us know that Barbie was the first adult doll manufactured for girls that did not just teach them to be mothers. We see stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) wake up in her dream house and have the perfect day. All her fellow Barbie’s have success in their careers, winning Nobel Prizes, being the President, driving an ambulance and generally having a great time.

Hello readers,

The most anticipated film of the year has finally arrived: Barbie! There has been a lot of hype around this film thanks to the amazing marketing team and the enormous cast featured in the film, not forgetting legendary director Greta Gerwig. I myself have been eagerly awaiting this film and to sum it up, it did not disappoint.

I was able to see some of the Barbie European Premiere in London as they erected a giant screen for those who did not manage to get in. I will be posting some images on my instagram @film_fanatic00

While many clips of the film were released, little was known about the overall plot and I was pleasantly surprised when I sat down to watch. I thought I knew everything about the film due to the sheer volume of content on social media but they really kept the main story hidden. This will be spoiler free as I know some people have not yet had the chance to see the film.

Barbie (2023)

Barbie’s have always been a controversial topic: on one hand they promote feminism as Barbie has her own car, house, career without the help of a man. Her boyfriend Ken is a background character with no job/house/car of his own. The dolls were released at a time when women in America couldn’t even have their own bank accounts and most had the job of housewife so little girls seeing Barbie as a lawyer, doctor, author, scientist or homeowner, empowered generations.

On the other hand, Barbie’s have always kept a very slim, totally unrealistic body type. They have feet always ready to wear high heels, waists smaller than their heads and lipstick and mascara on their faces. While Barbie has been released as different ethnicities, she has not had a realistic figure and it wasn’t until 2019 that a Barbie in a wheelchair was put on the market permanently.

The film uses all of these controversies in their plot and makes sure that we know that they do not condone Barbie’s unrealistic body but rather celebrate her achievements. We start with the 2001: Space Odyssey opener that has been teased, letting us know that Barbie was the first adult doll manufactured for girls that did not just teach them to be mothers. We see stereotypical Barbie (Margot Robbie) wake up in her dream house and have the perfect day. All her fellow Barbie’s have success in their careers, winning Nobel Prizes, being the President, driving an ambulance and generally having a great time.

Barbie starts having some troubling thoughts and her feet lose their natural heel so she is sent to Weird Barbie (Kate McKinnon) for help. She tells her to go to the Real World to find the girl playing with her as she must be passing on her depressing thoughts. Ken, who up until this point has been side-lined by Barbie in favour of hanging with the girls and sleepovers, decides to join her on the trip.

The chaos ensues from there and we meet the humans Gloria and Sasha who assist Barbie in her quest towards the end of the film. I thought it was a great idea to incorporate Mattel into the film and shows maturity that they allowed Greta and Noah Baumbach (co-writer) to poke fun at them. Barbie also discovers that the Real World is not as perfect as Barbieland and that women are not in charge. Ken discovers the patriarchy and things start unravelling when he brings this revelation to the other Kens and Barbies (and Allan).

This film was a lovely celebration of female power and how women are always expected to be two things at once, for example they have to be decisive but not bossy, dress nicely but not too sexy and so on.

Barbieland itself was a wonderful playground filled with all the accessories one could want but I am glad we got to see the Real World too as that grounded the story for me. All of the costumes were amazing and there were so many details nodding to discontinued Barbie’s such as her sister Skipper and Midge, the pregnant doll.

Margot Robbie was amazing as Barbie, balancing human emotions perfectly but Ryan Gosling as Ken was a real standout. His comic timing and facial expressions were right on point and I would like to see him do more comedy.

Overall the film was a joyful over-the-top celebration of humanity, especially women and made you think about what makes us human. Beneath the pink and the costumes and excellent soundtrack, the film had real heart and emotion that Greta always injects into her films. I will most certainly be watching the film again ad I encourage everyone to go along to the cinema to see Barbie in action. As the film campaign has said: ‘It’s a film for everyone who likes Barbie and everyone who hates Barbie’. I give the film 5/5.

Happy Watching,
Robyn

Guest Writer: Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret

Something my friend and I discussed after watching was how cool it was to see a film where a girl Margaret’s age is the protagonist, and she deals with all the relatable experiences that she goes through. Most rite of passage films exploring female characters show them in high school, university or in a first job. When it comes to Margaret’s age group films focused on them is still quite unusual and unique unless the genre is adventure, science-fiction or fantasy, which somewhat undercuts the more realistic moments – i.e. The Goonies, E.T. or Stranger Things, and even then there are more male characters than female. While Finding Ohana (2021) features a young girl as the protagonist, the film has more in common with The Goonies than it does with Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret.

Hello readers,

Today’s post has been written by my very special guest writer, Terry! We went to see the film Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret at a rooftop cinema and Terry had the following thoughts:

Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret (2023)

The film follows titular sixth-grader Margaret Simon, and her friends and family as she embarks on a journey of self-discovery while navigating all the trials and tribulations that follow. The film is based on eponymous novel by Judy Blume, which was published in 1970, the era in which the film is set as well – consequently many of its elements were definitely ahead of their time. Specifically, in exploring many important themes such as: friendship, religious pressure and tolerance, interfaith marriage, atheism, societal expectations (i.e. being a working mother versus staying at home), puberty, as well as the rush to grow up along with all the pressures young kids put on themselves and each other in reaching certain milestones before being ready or even truly understanding what it all means.

Book-to-film adaptations can be a tricky business and balancing act, changing too much of the source material risks alienating fans and losing many elements of what made the original special and beloved (i.e. the Percy Jackson films). Such is why many say, ‘the book is always better than the movie’. So, it’s fortunate then the author herself has claimed the adaptation is better than her book. While I’ve personally never read any of Blume’s novels I’ve always known who she is and some of the themes she likes exploring, so I can say I was genuinely excited to watch this film. The main reason being the author’s stamp of approval (it’s always a good sign when an adaptation has the author’s support), others including the cast and the subject matter.

The catalyst for the film’s plot and Margaret’s journey is the Simon family’s move from a flat in New York to a suburb in New Jersey after her father is granted a prosperous promotion. This advancement doesn’t only turn Margaret’s world upside-down but inspires her mother Barbara to abandon her hobby of painting and job as an art teacher. Margaret is confused as to why her mother would quit a job that she loves so much, but Barbara claims she is excited to finally have the free time to spend with her and to help out on the school PTA ‘like all the other moms’.

However, Margaret gradually becomes more independent with this life change, especially after being welcomed into an existing friend group at her new school. Her new friends, in their rush to become grown-up and ‘mature’, introduce Margaret to the world of: first crushes, preteen parties, rumours and gossip, while also awakening her urgency to fulfil certain milestones and rite of passages. Including but not limited to: finally getting her period, wearing a bra, and having her first kiss.

Additionally, Margaret’s teacher Mr. Benedict stimulates her curiosity in regard to religion and her own family when he suggests she do a report on her unique (for the time) perspective of coming from a multifaith household. In the sense that Barbara is Christian and was brought up by very devout parents, whilst Margaret’s father Herb and his family are Jewish.

Nowadays a ‘mixed marriage’ like this wouldn’t raise as many eyebrows as it did back then, but for Barbara marrying Herb meant her family saw fit to disown her and cut off all contact. This horrifying rejection is partly what steered Margaret’s parents in choosing to raise her without a religion, with the intention that she choose for herself when she is old enough. While their reasons were noble, and certainly understandable given the circumstances of the situation, an unintended consequence is a feeling of confusion and alienation Margaret struggles with since religion is almost a taboo subject in their family. But even then Margaret is not fully free from religious pressures. Her loving paternal grandmother Sylvia wants her to ultimately decide to become Jewish, whereas her parents seem to hope that in the end she won’t favour any religion. Barbara, perhaps due to the understandable trauma her parents left her with, goes as far to vehemently disapprove and actively discourage Margaret’s religious curiosity. While Herb doesn’t stand in her way he similarly hopes their daughter will gradually lose interest in religion if they don’t force ‘neutrality’ on her.

Despite the feeling of being pulled in numerous directions, and confusion about how and why religion is so powerful in dividing people, Margaret has her own private relationship with God, and reaches out often throughout the film (hence the title). God acts as somewhat of an impartial confidant for Margaret, who habitually prays for guidance and her family’s wellbeing; but also asks for help in reaching/achieving the milestones that her friends introduced her to. In a particularly vulnerable moment Margaret mentally asks God, “Why do I only feel you when I’m alone?”

Although I can’t compare the film’s characters to their novelistic counterparts, I feel like everyone was perfectly cast and subsequently the acting was very good. I was familiar with the young actress playing Margaret, Abby Ryder Fortson, from her portrayal of Cassie Lang in the first two Ant-Man films; and she has definitely come into her own with her well-deserved protagonist placement. Additionally, I’m familiar with Rachel McAdams and Kathy Bates’ work and feel they were perfectly cast as, respectively, Margaret’s mother and grandmother.

Something my friend and I discussed after watching was how cool it was to see a film where a girl Margaret’s age is the protagonist, and she deals with all the relatable experiences that she goes through. Most rite of passage films exploring female characters show them in high school, university or in a first job. When it comes to Margaret’s age group films focused on them is still quite unusual and unique unless the genre is adventure, science-fiction or fantasy, which somewhat undercuts the more realistic moments – i.e. The Goonies, E.T. or Stranger Things, and even then there are more male characters than female. While Finding Ohana (2021) features a young girl as the protagonist, the film has more in common with The Goonies than it does with Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret.

Furthermore, the film ever so effortlessly passes the Bechdel test more than once as Margaret has many conversations with her friends and the women in her family about varying topics. For anyone unfamiliar the Bechdel test is a 3-rule test. In order to pass it a work of fiction must 1) feature at least two named female characters, 2) who have a conversation, 3) about a topic not about a man. The fact that Are You there, God? It’s me, Margaret passes the Bechdel is refreshing as it continues being an important tool in gauging female representation in works of fiction, especially when so many media forms fail it (seemingly without even trying).

My only gripes with the film that stop it from being perfect is, even though it did accomplish many of the beats it set out to, it still felt as though there were some loose ends. For example, we don’t see how Margaret makes up with a friend she fought with or find out whether Barbara finally makes amends with her parents. Moreover, I also would have liked to see more interactions with Margaret and her crush Moose, who was a little side-lined throughout the feature (although apparently he was even less of a presence in the book). Despite this, all in all the film was a success. While being set in the 70s it had more diversity than you’d expect, additionally the comedic moments in the film help in lightening the overall tone in regard to all the dramatic scenes. To boot, the film would’ve been impossible to make when the book was first published since the topics such as interfaith marriage, puberty and periods were especially controversial back then, but fortunately with films such as Are You There, God? It’s Me, Margaret (where they are on full display) these topics are starting to become less and less stigmatised for the next generation.

Terry rates the film as 4/5

Look out for future reviews from special guest writers…

Happy Watching,
Robyn

2023: New Perspectives: The Little Mermaid

I think the cast were well chosen and I really love the decision to cast a woman of colour as Ariel. The film is set somewhere that she could be a native but also mermaids aren’t real so logic didn’t need to play into the original ethnicity of the characters. This is further demonstrated with Ariel’s father and sisters. Halle Bailey captured Ariel’s innocence and wonderment at the human world as well as showing great chemistry with Jonah Hauer-King (Prince Eric) and possessing an emotive singing voice.

Hello there,

It has been a long time since I wrote a post on here. The main reason for this being that I started working in the film and television industry and I didn’t have the time. I have recently started a new position and have a little more free time so have decided to resurrect this blog!

After working in VFX for almost 2 years, I think I now have a different perspective on film and TV, especially if I have been involved with the project. I am going to start by reviewing a couple of recently released items that I have worked on and I will see whether knowing the ins and outs of a production enhances or takes away from the viewing experience.

The Little Mermaid (2023)



I am starting with the Little Mermaid which I was fortunate enough to attend a cast/crew screening of at Leicester Square. I spent a couple of days assisting on cataloguing shots so I got to see a lot of them in the early stages. My former company also did the VFX so I got to see a few early versions at showcases.

We saw the film in an IMAX screen that is the biggest I have ever experienced a film in. The quality and sound were amazing, all of the VFX on the shots really popped and it was an interesting way to watch this film.

Overall, I really enjoyed the film from the songs with a touch up from legend Lin-Manuel Miranda (Hamilton, Encanto) to the fleshed-out storyline including Eric and Ariel living somewhere in the Caribbean and interacting with villagers. I know that there was some discussion around Flounder’s new appearance but once you get into the film, this detail does not distract.

I think the cast were well chosen and I really love the decision to cast a woman of colour as Ariel. The film is set somewhere that she could be a native but also mermaids aren’t real so logic didn’t need to play into the original ethnicity of the characters. This is further demonstrated with Ariel’s father and sisters. Halle Bailey captured Ariel’s innocence and wonderment at the human world as well as showing great chemistry with Jonah Hauer-King (Prince Eric) and possessing an emotive singing voice.

My favourite songs in terms of staging were Kiss the Girl and Part of Your World. The lyrics are catchy and both did some new things from the original Little Mermaid film.

I was not a big fan of the 1989 version as I thought Ariel didn’t have much of a personality and spent most of the film as demure and non-verbal. I did however enjoy the new version as I think they expanded the story and despite not speaking Halle Bailey had a very expressive face. I think casting Awkwafina as Scuttle gave the role a new spin and her voice is very recognisable for older viewers from films such as Crazy Rich Asians, Shang-Chi and Ocean’s 8. She was also a voice in Raya and the Last Dragon so younger viewers may be already familiar with her.

Seeing some of the shots in advance did not spoil or ruin the film for me, mainly as it’s a well known story and also as I only saw a very small part of the final film. I think Disney are doing a good job with their adaptations and as long as they keep updating them and adding new additions from the originals, then they will remain popular.

I gave this film 4/5. I am taking a point off as it was still a little cheesy and the fact that she had to kiss Eric to win back her voice and tail did not set a great example for young women

Happy Watching,
Robyn

Summer of Cinema: Black Widow

The Widows and their master, Dreykov (Ray Winstone) has a strong relevance to Hollywood after the MeToo Movement and the equality that women in the industry have been working towards since cinema began. Dreykov takes the free will and childhoods of these girls and turns them into killing machines. The big reveal of the film is the identity of Taskmaster. An assassin with the ability to copy any fighting style they see and beat an opponent with their own moves. When Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko) is revealed as Dreykov’s daughter who Natasha thought she had killed before defecting to join S.H.I.E.L.D, it shows the lengths that Dreykov will go to for power. Changing the character from male to female for the film, gave an added element to the female power as the mysterious villain is often male.

Dear Reader,

I, like many others have been waiting for this film for over a year. Marvel fans have had some amazing TV shows to keep us entertained in 2021, but when the time came for Black Widow, I had to see the first female Avenger get her due. In some ways, it has been much longer than a year waiting for this film. The friend who organised my group outing has been anticipating since Black Widow’s debut in Iron Man 2 (2010). Natasha Romanoff has always been a mystery. We have seen a little of her back story in the Red Room, training to be an assassin but how did she really become Black Widow and how did she join S.H.I.E.L.D?

I saw this film at a Vue Extreme screening in Westfield Shepherd’s Bush, London so I definitely got the full effect. The screen was massive and the audience was packed for a Friday afternoon. I went with a group of friends and mutual friends and despite not everyone being a Marvel geek, we all enjoyed seeing Black Widow get her moment to shine.

There’s so much to dissect within the film including amazing aerial fight sequences, powerful female characters, an unexpected family drama aspect, humorous squabbling and the long awaited Budapest story.

I will start first with the characters. We have met Natasha Romanoff in several Marvel films as different versions of herself. There was Natalie Rushman in Iron Man 2 and her true name, Natalia Alianova Romanova was revealed in Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Despite an appearance in eight other Marvel films, Black Widow has always kept her cards close to her chest in terms of her origin story; we have only been given little bits and pieces.

In Black Widow, we find Natasha (Scarlett Johansson) on the run from the government after the events of Captain America: Civil War. She expertly evades Secretary Ross (William Hurt) and ends up in Norway. She still has her trademark red hair but we know that at some point she will dye it blonde for her appearance in Avengers: Infinity War.

We also learn of Yelena Belova (Florence Pugh), a Black Widow agent on mission in Morocco. After exposure to a chemical, Yelena wakes up from mind control and goes rogue. Natasha finds her in Budapest and after trying to kill each other, the two remember their past as sisters in America.

Natasha and Yelena were raised as sisters for three years with the Red Guardian – Alexei (David Harbour) and Melina (Rachel Weisz) – a former Widow posing as their parents. The first sequence shows their life together and then suddenly having to leave sleepy Ohio for Russia to train in the Red Room.

When Natasha learns that the Red Room still exists and girls are still being trained as assassins, she agrees to help Yelena take it down. They team up with Alexei and Melina once again who help them find the Red Room. There is a big focus on aerial stunts in this film which is something Marvel loves to dabble in with its flying heroes such as Falcon, Iron Man, Vision and War Machine but we have not seen this so much with Natasha. There is the small airplane sequence where Alexei tries to fend off the police from the wing of the plane; the helicopter jailbreak in Russia with Yelena flying it and Natasha swinging from a cable and of course, the fight sequence when everything falls after the Red Room is blown up.

The Widows and their master, Dreykov (Ray Winstone) has strong relevance in Hollywood after the MeToo Movement and the equality that women in the industry have been working towards since cinema began. Dreykov takes the free will and childhoods of these girls and turns them into killing machines. The big reveal of the film is the identity of Taskmaster. An assassin with the ability to copy any fighting style they see and beat an opponent with their own moves. When Taskmaster (Olga Kurylenko) is revealed as Dreykov’s daughter who Natasha thought she had killed before defecting to join S.H.I.E.L.D; it shows the lengths that Dreykov will go to for power. Changing the character from male to female for the film gave an added element to the female power as the mysterious villain is often male.

When Natasha and Yelena sit down for dinner with Alexei and Melina, family dynamics that had been forgotten for 20 years come into play with Melina criticising Natasha’s posture and Alexei telling the women to listen to their ‘mother.’ The humour and banter between the four characters demonstrates the closeness they once shared. They are able to fall back into familiar roles.

An element of the film that fans have been waiting for is the story behind what happened in Budapest with Natasha and Clint Barton. It started as a throwaway line in Avengers (2012) but has become a key part of Natasha’s story. When she finds Yelena in Budapest at a safe house, she recounts meeting Clint and him helping her avoid being recalled to the Red Room. We get details such as hiding in an air duct in the Metro for two days and using the same safe house where Natasha and Yelena meet. This is evidenced by arrow holes in the wall. Natasha mentioned before that Clint was sent to kill her but instead gave her a chance to join a different side. Her accidental killing (or so she thought) of Dreykov’s daughter was her proof that she had separated herself from Dreykov and the Widows.

Overall, this film was entertaining and a welcome return for Marvel at the cinema. It was funnier than I expected whilst still maintaining a serious plot and a worthy adversary to destroy. The aerial stunt at the end was like nothing I had seen in a Marvel outing or elsewhere and was amazing to see on a big screen. If you have been waiting to return to the cinema, definitely make this film your first one back.

I give this film 5/5.

Happy Watching,

Robyn